GIBS is one of
the best MBA school in India which gives the following views on the recent
budget:
The Union Budget
2016 has been crafted under the most extraordinarily challenging economic
settings India has seen. The challenges faced are:
•Risks of
further global slowdown and turbulence. Additional fiscal burden due to 7th
Central Pay Commission recommendations and OROP.
• The external
environment is both uncertain and volatile, the inherited deadlock caused by
stressed banks and the strained private sector is yet to be broken, poor
monsoons have caused immense rural misery, and demand, a central pillar of
growth, has been lukewarm.
Many of the measures needed to face up to this
challenge are not, strictly speaking, financial. However, it has a much greater
sense of purpose and direction. It signals macroeconomic credibility by
adhering to fiscal deficit targets.
The ambitious
provision of LPG connections to all is quite revolutionary, for its health,
gender justice and aspirational effects, though its political-economy effects
on the subsidy bill will become apparent over the next few years. It goes to
great lengths to reverse the government’s pro-corporate image.
The principal
tax rates have reached stability. The rates of direct taxes are comparable to
international rates (except for personal tax brackets, which vary across
countries on account of differing price levels); and indirect taxes are in a
long process of replacement by the Goods and Service Tax, which is stuck in
disagreements between States.
A rise in
indirect taxes, as opposed to direct taxes, is a clear case of regressive
taxation because both poor and rich pay the same tax per unit of purchase of an
item. That this has been the pattern of revenue mobilization and the previous
government goes to show their concern for the ‘aam aadmi’. For 2016-17, the
Finance Minister has promised to bring this ratio down to 3.5 percent primarily
through a 20 percent increase in indirect taxes and as much as 39 per cent in
excise duties, even as the corporate taxes go down.
There is another
problem an increase in indirect taxes brings to the table: inflation. The fact
that the economy is not witnessing high inflation today is not because of any
prudent monetary policy but because the oil prices are at a real low — that
might not be the permanent state of affairs in the coming year. If the oil
prices go up, with these hiked indirect tax rates, inflation might hit the
roof.
The odd changes
in taxation provisions for future provident fund withdrawals make it a budget
hostile to the middle class.
The salaried
class is likely to feel hard done by a move to tax 60 per cent of the corpus
created from contributions to the Employees’ Provident Fund starting April 1 as
part of a move to create a ‘pensioned society.'
So, it can be
observed that the budget has been designed keeping all classes in mind. There
are a few loopholes which can be rectified with proper planning at the
grassroots.
No comments:
Post a Comment